|
For many of us, amateur commentary and critique
of 'professional' football is a national pastime. It's a shame we
don't pay such close attention to our business. Take a moment to
ponder this
.
- How would you feel about investing £millions in a new
player for your team without having seen him play beforehand?
- Once the player joined your team, how regularly would you want
to see him play in order to assess his ability, strengths and
weaknesses?
- How personalised would his ongoing coaching be to ensure his
fitness and skills continue to improve?
I can take a fairly accurate educated guess on your answers. So
I'm wondering why we don't apply the same principal to our sales
professionals?
- Why is it that companies continue to invest millions in a sales
team in order to grow their business without ever really seeing
the sales people in action?
- Why are salespeople are rarely assessed and coached in the field
to improve their performance and thus maximise the organisation's
return on investment?
- Why is it that there is little emphasis on improving
the skill and knowledge levels of salespeople other than, perhaps,
a little 'product' training?
I saw an advertisement last week, which read 'Sales Director wanted
£28 million'. Although this appeared to be the salary, it was
of course, the estimated cost to the company were they to make the
wrong selection.
- Why are many senior management teams so cavalier
about measuring the real return on investment achieved by their
sales team other than tracking revenue?
- Why don't they understand where, and what added-value help
is necessary to increase sales performance?
What do you know about the standards of performance of your salespeople
and will this be enough to achieve your corporate goals? Surely
it is sheer madness to ignore the part of your business that is
potentially capable of generating such massive growth and profit
both now and in the future?
And so back to football
Before purchasing a player you would study his track record. You
would assess both his fitness and his skills (such as passing, shooting,
heading the ball and his ability to accurately position and read
the game). Scouts and management would observe the person playing
prior to making such a huge investment. Judgements in relation to
their ability to blend into the team would be considered seriously,
a thorough medical would take place and a contract negotiated.
Now lets see what often happens in many UK organisations when it
comes to selecting, managing and growing a successful sales team
.
New salespeople are often recruited from a steady stream of (often
irrelevant) c.v's from selected organisations which have a vested
interest in placing their candidate. The interview process is often
informal and based on 'gut feel' because the sales managers performing
interviews are unprepared, under time pressure and inadequately experienced
in selecting top sales performers. A manager often interviews a candidate
without the ability (or recognition that it's necessary) to match
the Knowledge, Attitudes, Skills
and Habits of the candidate with the requirements of
the job. In addition, the candidate is rarely evaluated in a real
life situation - we don't get to see the 'player' on the 'pitch'.
Joint interviews of candidates are decreasing due to time pressures.
Proof of previous sales performance, P60 supporting evidence of past
earnings and, perhaps most surprising, references, are seldom requested.
Very often, the end result is the selection of the wrong candidate
which then takes many months to become apparent. By which time of
course, you're stuck with the problem of reversing your expensive
decision with employment law and numerous other ramifications to
consider.
The Lynch-Pin Point
In this age of the Internet isn't it more cost effective to invest
less cash on finding the candidate while investing more in the
correct selection process?
Recruiting the wrong salespeople is extremely expensive, time consuming
and unproductive so why do we notinsist on a professional selection
process in the same way that football managers do?
Your new salesperson joins the team
.
Once on board, our football manager would insist on continued meticulous
screening in training and during match play whilst an on-gong personal
programme of coaching and improvement was agreed.
But our Managing Director
..
Gives the new sales person a territory and a sales target based
on the organisation's requirements (i.e. top down quota). The person
may be given an induction programme and perhaps even some product
training if he's lucky. However, he seldom receives ongoing job
assessment and coaching and 6 months later has, in all likelihood,
still not benefited from a visit with his manager. The company management
adds to this folly by implicitly supporting the lack of standards
of performance, systems and methodologies required to measure the
necessary quality and quantity of sales effort.
The boards of directors usually ignore these issues when markets
are buoyant and business is going well. The reality is that in fact,
they are missing £millions in lost opportunities. They then
react in 'panic mode' when sales are decreasing which often results
in new management appointments to allow the same problems to occur
once more - only dressed in a different wrapper.
This is not the way to plan for success and it is certainly not
the way you would run a football team!
We call this 'management by hope'.
|